Improving Efficiency at SSA: NOSSCR’s Efforts to Streamline the Electronic Signature Process
The Social Security Administration (SSA) took a step toward modernization when it began accepting electronic signatures – but there is significant room for improvement. NOSSCR’s recent testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee shed light on inefficiencies in the current system, including the unreasonable requirement for verification of electronic signatures by phone.
During the testimony, interim NOSSCR CEO David Camp stressed the need for change.
“This is an extraordinary waste of resources, particularly since electronic signatures are verified by the electronic signature platform that includes information like the signer’s name, email address, phone number, and IP address,” Camp said. “This impedes the processing of valid documents if claimants don’t answer the call or don’t have reliable access to a phone.”
The requirement not only increases the workload for SSA staff – it also causes unnecessary delays in providing essential benefits to those who need them. Inconsistencies in accepting electronic signatures due to outdated guidelines can also lead to unfounded rejections, creating more barriers for applicants.
Security measures that authenticate electronic signatures already exist, making phone verification an inexplicable, outdated redundancy.
NOSSCR’s recommendation to eliminate this step goes beyond convenience – it emphasizes resource management and improved service delivery. Trusting electronic signature technology, thereby streamlining the application process, will speed up the application process, save valuable time for SSA staff, and reduce stress for applicants.
Removing phone verification would be another step forward in embracing digital practices at the SSA.
This proposed change reflects a commitment to an efficient and responsive SSA system that respects the time and needs of its beneficiaries – and its staff.
We’re optimistic that SSA will take note and make policy changes to improve service and efficiency, especially when those changes save time and money. The well-being of applicants should be the top priority, and small changes like these can make a significant difference.
Click here to read more about NOSSCR’s testimony and proposed solutions.
Share Post
Recent news
Social Security offices have been closed for most of the pandemic. That effort to protect public health has wounded some of the neediest Americans.
Two hours west in Jackson, an old cotton city where almost 1 in 4 people live in poverty, Beth Bates, a legal services attorney, reviewed 4,000 pages of medical records she needed to know cold...
Where the push to bring Supplemental Security Income benefits up to federal poverty level stands
Democratic leaders in Washington, D.C., have touted a $3.5 trillion spending package aimed at helping to fight poverty. Yet initial drafts have not included proposed reforms to enhance Supplemental Security Income — also known as...
Democrats Want to Reform This Program That Helps Poor Elderly and Disabled Americans
President Joe Biden has invoked Franklin Delano Roosevelt several times as he has implemented sweeping anti-poverty measures to tackle record unemployment and economic turmoil. Hoping to model his legacy on the President who helped the...
