Improving Efficiency at SSA: NOSSCR’s Efforts to Streamline the Electronic Signature Process
The Social Security Administration (SSA) took a step toward modernization when it began accepting electronic signatures – but there is significant room for improvement. NOSSCR’s recent testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee shed light on inefficiencies in the current system, including the unreasonable requirement for verification of electronic signatures by phone.
During the testimony, interim NOSSCR CEO David Camp stressed the need for change.
“This is an extraordinary waste of resources, particularly since electronic signatures are verified by the electronic signature platform that includes information like the signer’s name, email address, phone number, and IP address,” Camp said. “This impedes the processing of valid documents if claimants don’t answer the call or don’t have reliable access to a phone.”
The requirement not only increases the workload for SSA staff – it also causes unnecessary delays in providing essential benefits to those who need them. Inconsistencies in accepting electronic signatures due to outdated guidelines can also lead to unfounded rejections, creating more barriers for applicants.
Security measures that authenticate electronic signatures already exist, making phone verification an inexplicable, outdated redundancy.
NOSSCR’s recommendation to eliminate this step goes beyond convenience – it emphasizes resource management and improved service delivery. Trusting electronic signature technology, thereby streamlining the application process, will speed up the application process, save valuable time for SSA staff, and reduce stress for applicants.
Removing phone verification would be another step forward in embracing digital practices at the SSA.
This proposed change reflects a commitment to an efficient and responsive SSA system that respects the time and needs of its beneficiaries – and its staff.
We’re optimistic that SSA will take note and make policy changes to improve service and efficiency, especially when those changes save time and money. The well-being of applicants should be the top priority, and small changes like these can make a significant difference.
Click here to read more about NOSSCR’s testimony and proposed solutions.
Share Post
Recent news
How COVID-19 Long Haulers Could Change the U.S. Disability Benefits System
When COVID-19 began spreading in the U.S. in March 2020, McKale Santin was working at a nursing home in Burlington, Vermont. She and her coworkers didn’t yet know how deadly the virus would become, but...
Biden fires head of Social Security Administration, a Trump holdover who drew the ire of Democrats
President Biden on Friday fired Social Security Commissioner Andrew Saul, a holdover from the Trump administration who had alienated crucial Democratic constituencies with policies designed to clamp down on benefits and an uncompromising anti-union stance....
Stimulus Checks Cause Some To Lose Disability Benefits
Stimulus payments aren’t supposed to count against eligibility for social insurance programs like disability benefits, but some people might have lost benefits because of too much money in their bank accounts. The Social Security Administration...
