
Practice Tip: Understanding and Resolving Scrambled Earnings
November 20, 2025
Ed Olson and Tom Krause
Social Security earnings records form the foundation of benefit calculations, yet even the most carefully maintained system can experience what the agency terms “scrambled earnings.” These situations arise when wages or self-employment income belonging to one individual are mistakenly posted to another person’s earnings record. For practitioners, recognizing and addressing scrambled earnings can mean the difference between accurate benefit amounts and protracted disputes with the agency.
The Program Operations Manual System defines scrambled earnings in straightforward terms at POMS RM 03870.045: they represent wages or self-employment income that have been credited to the wrong person’s earnings record. While the concept seems simple, the resolution process rarely is. The Social Security Administration acknowledges in that same section that untangling these errors often proves both difficult and time-consuming.
The complexity stems from several practical challenges. The transient nature of many workers—particularly in industries with high turnover or seasonal employment—can make it nearly impossible to locate individuals years after the earnings were reported. Even more problematic are cases involving identity theft or the unauthorized use of Social Security numbers, where one party may have deliberately used another’s identifying information for employment purposes. In these situations, establishing the true identity of the individuals involved becomes a prerequisite to any meaningful correction.
For attorneys representing claimants, scrambled earnings may surface during routine benefit calculations when expected earnings fail to appear on a client’s record, or conversely, when unfamiliar employers or income amounts appear. The discovery often comes at critical moments—during initial benefit applications, when calculating retirement or disability benefits, or during appeals when every quarter of coverage matters.
The implications extend beyond simple accounting errors. Scrambled earnings can affect whether a client meets insured status requirements for disability or retirement benefits under sections 214 and 223 of the Social Security Act. They can alter the calculation of Average Indexed Monthly Earnings under section 215, and ultimately change benefit amounts. When the scramble involves unreported or underreported earnings, it may also trigger questions about a client’s work history that require careful documentation and explanation.
Resolution requires persistence and thorough documentation. Practitioners should be prepared to gather employment records, tax documents, and any available evidence that demonstrates where the earnings actually belong. The agency will need to verify both that the earnings were incorrectly posted to one record and that they properly belong on another. The general provisions for correcting earnings records appear in POMS RM 03870.001 through the RM 03870 series, with the specific scrambled earnings guidance at RM 03870.045. In cases where the other individual cannot be located or where unauthorized number use is suspected, the process becomes even more involved and may implicate the provisions in POMS RM 10210.001 regarding misuse of Social Security numbers.
Understanding that scrambled earnings represent a recognized category of earnings record errors—one that the agency itself acknowledges as challenging—can help attorneys set realistic expectations with clients about resolution timelines. While the correction process may be lengthy, the POMS provisions at least provide a framework for addressing these situations when they arise. When confronting potential scrambled earnings issues, practitioners should document everything carefully, as the burden of proof for corrections under POMS RM 03870.010 ultimately rests with establishing the correct earnings record through credible evidence.
This is a guest column. The views expressed in this column are the views of the author alone, and do not represent the views of NOSSCR, NOSSCR’s leadership, or NOSSCR’s staff.

